Let’s begin with the bottom line: “In sum, we conclude that email service on the Chinese defendants is prohibited by the Hague Service Convention, and thus improper under Rule 4(f)(3).” Smart Study Co., LTD. v. Acuteye-US, No. 24-313, slip op. at 19 (2nd Cir. December...
Second Circuit Limits Alternative Service by Email on Chinese “Schedule A” Defendants in Case of First Impression
read more